Capitalism failed to achieve its own programmeThe current world economic crisis is
admitted to be serious even by the International Monetary Fund. It
could develop to become a general depression. Many are looking back at
the great depression of 1929 in order to understand the unfolding
events. True, it is still only a problem in the
finance sector, but the threat of collapse of the US financial system
and with it an unprecedented financial crisis in the capitalist world
is a frightful scenario for the ordinary masses because finance is at
the helm of the modern capitalist system and neo-liberalism is really
the ideology of the financial interests. The latter was able to replace
the Keynesian state intervention policy with free market principles. We are told that the lesser the
intervention of the state the better it would be for economic growth.
Furthermore, it is emphasised that with the new knowledge in micro
economics, the market could be fair, free and progressive. Hence within
an organised society the principle of survival of the fittest is not
such a bad idea, as the weak and the disabled will be looked after
anyway, by the state. But having preached all that, now, the same The immediate reason for this breakdown
is the risk taken by speculators. As long as there is an assurance that
the state will intervene to rescue, there is no real risk for
speculation. So, it is not ‘short sighted speculation’ but unethical
and callous activity of the financial players, that affected the
situation so badly. When the rate of profit goes down, it
is not useful to invest in any productive sector, especially in sectors
with the most modern technology. Speculation, credit frauds, stock
swindles and even plain gambling, could be attractive, serious
activities for someone who would borrow money. Strangely enough all these were
explained in Das Kapital by Karl Marx. He says, “the credit
system, which in its first stages furtively creeps in as the humble
assistant of accumulation, drawing into the hands of the individual or
associated capitalists, by invisible threads, the money resources which
lie scattered, over the surface of the society, in larger or smaller
amounts; but it soon becomes a new and terrible weapon in the battle of
competition and is finally transformed into an enormous social
mechanism for the centralisation of capitals.” Now this concentration of capital and the increased production leads to a decline in the rate of profit, driving small borrowers in the direction of adventure. Centralisation Within a market economy even a partial
solution can be achieved only, by taking drastic steps towards social
and political centralisation, with consent and democracy in the world
arena. The international financial system has virtually escaped all
physical and political barriers. However labour and produce are
restricted in many ways. National and political barriers prevent the
flow of labour, according to its demand. The discussions by the World
Trade Organisation are sill incomplete. Thus the neo-liberals’ promise of
globalisation with freedom for all aspects of human activity, remains
an empty dream. Instead globalisation with Washington consensus,
American hegemony and Pentagon military supremacy developed. Capitalism has failed to achieve its
own programme because its action is governed, not by the requirement of
socially developed human beings, but by the realisation of maximum
profit. Under pressure of the present crisis, will it take positive
steps or will it allow a massive destruction of capital? On the other
hand events may unfold towards the way out as predicted by Marx, “The
monopoly of capital becomes a fetter upon the mode of production, which
has sprung up and flourished along with, and under it. Centralisation
of the means of production and socialisation of labour, at last reach a
point, where they become incompatible with their capitalist integument.
This integument is burst asunder. The knell of capitalist private
property is nigh. The expropriators are expropriated.” |