The recent
provincial council elections show the nature of the consolidation of
the Sinhala nationalist state. One could extrapolate from each
district, and indications will show the consolidation of Sinhala
hegemony throughout Sinhala areas except perhaps in the Western
Province. This has intensified repression.
Mano Ganesan maybe charged for “assisting” the LTTE. An attempt is being made to track down all those responsible for the Hiru publication. Hiru was a Sinhala weekly that defended Tamil autonomy. However, there are some oppositional forces that directly or indirectly challenge Sinhala hegemony.
Firstly the Tamil resistance in the north is still forceful. In spite of government claims of LTTE losses, the latter is continuing to be a formidable resistance. It is true that they have lost important avenues of resources but they appear to have overcome these setbacks. The most important gain has been the sympathy of the Tamil masses.
In
spite of the appeals of the government through leaflets and messages
sent through the administrative mechanism involving GA, AGAs and
gramsevekas, refugees have not come back to Sinhala army controlled
areas. Even the social services’ appeals of international agencies have
failed to break this determination of these hungry and miserable
people.
Even in the Tamil diaspora the sympathy
for the resistance has grown. In other words Tamil resistance has taken
a wider meaning. The Sinhala army’s attempt to takeover the heart of
the Tamil homeland has aroused strong feelings among all Tamils.
Secondly the teachers’ boycott of A/L examination work
became a problem for the government. At a time when even the
oppositional political parties, the UNP and the JVP, succumbed to
Sinhala nationalist pressure, the stand taken by the teachers is
remarkable.
The Mahinda
regime accused teacher union leaders of collaboration with the LTTE.
Indirectly, it was taken by the government before the Supreme Court and the CJ ruled that the government should come up with a feasible solution. In effect the Supreme Court ruling accuses the government of negligence and playing with the future of students!
Trade union movement
In the meantime
there are three tendencies within the trade union movement.
What is the
attitude of the international community? This is basically governed by
the stand of the Indian rulers.
Delhi leaders are more frightened of the LTTE than of the Indian left
or the Tamil Nadu agitations. They expect the Sinhala army to gain
control over the Tamil homeland, before any meaningful steps are taken
to persuade the Mahinda regime towards real power sharing or autonomy
for the Tamil homeland.
This position has been accepted by the world powers in spite of the
liberal remarks that they make here and there. However, international
left and far left movements have stopped believing government and the
JVP propaganda. The former has taken a strong stand for devolution.
Tamil liberation
They have recognised Tamil liberation as an authentic movement against oppression. The left in India, particularly the communist parties, have taken Tamil autonomy as a serious demand and both parties have dropped their special connection to the JVP.
In this scenario there is a strong tendency developing for a way out challenging the Sinhala hegemony of the government. Left currents from many directions are coming together to put together a common programme to struggle against not only Sinhala hegemony but also the pseudo opposition of the UNP. The need of the hour is to make democracy and freedom a reality.